Steven Montgomery

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dark Matter/Dark Energy #28972
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Black Holes, mathematical fantasies, an expanding universe, and such are ad hoc patches made on the standard cosmological model. They couldn’t understand why galaxies don’t fly apart and why a galaxies rotational speed is different than what theory says they should be. So they had to create patches to satisfy their theory.

    In reality there are no such things as black holes, dark matter, dark energy and escapes into mathematical fantasies. Instead of a gravity centric universe it is instead electricity centric. Electricity is thousands of times greater than gravity. Birkeland currents, electric arcs, and other explanations of the Electric Universe explain reality much better. In my humble opinion, of course. 🙂

    in reply to: Private: UM vs. Electric Universe theory #28954
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    Hi Courtney,

    Because of health reasons and just dealing with life in general, I’m only about a third of the way through Chapter Five of Volume One. But my first impressions are that the UM is an excellent science book for homeschoolers, advanced kids in middle school, and for high school or Junior College.

    For one thing it challenges the prevailing (but crumbling) theories and the standard cosmological model. In other words it serves as an excellent check on the standard model.

    More to come. As I have time to study it. 🙂

    in reply to: Private: UM vs. Electric Universe theory #21832
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    Also, you state “Specifically, our research in the area of crater creation methodology is more extensive, well documented and explained than any other treatise on the subject (including EU) that we have found anywhere in almost 30 years of research.” Is there a way to point me to this research? I know that plasma physicists (not necessarily main stream science) electrical engineers and electric arc physicists and others have explanations and methodologies for every type of crater event. Any way I would like to compare your methodology with EU. Maybe l there’s some common ground or overlap. Maybe there pieces either UM or EU are missing. At the very least it should be thoroughly looked at and evaluated. On both sides. Just saying.

    in reply to: Private: UM vs. Electric Universe theory #21831
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    Of course I should have noted that it (where the sun gets its light, etc.) Is found in the Doctrine and Covenants as well as the book of Abraham. Just wanted to make that clarification.

    in reply to: Private: UM vs. Electric Universe theory #21815
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    I am certainly not an expert on either theory. But have studied both the UM and EU. At least the UM from what is available on this website (I haven’t bought any books due to poverty).

    You might be right regarding Meteor Crater and its diatreme. And maybe this is the way that other craters on earth were created. But maybe there is a mix between both the way craters are created with the UM and EU.

    I know that the EU has duplicated every type of crater, as far as I know, that exists. It seems plausible to me that the craters on the moon, mars, the moons of Saturn and Jupiter and elsewhere were made by electric discharge events. All I’m asking of the UM model folks is to give the EU a fair hearing.

    In the Doctrine and Covenants, it states that the Sun gets it light from other Stars all the way to the great governing one. This is very close to what the EU folks state is occurring with regards to the Solar System, galaxies, filamentary streams (Birkeland Currents) between systems, etc.

    Give EU a fair shake. I think there is much truth present there.

    I haven’t read the UM books because I am on disability and just can’t afford them. But if there are snippets or something you could let me read that would be great. God bless you in your efforts, hold fast to that which is good.

    in reply to: Private: UM vs. Electric Universe theory #21794
    Steven Montgomery
    Participant

    Having studied the EU theory a bit, I think they have a better understanding of what goes on between planets, star systems, galaxies and so forth. With the entire universe being filled with electric energy, and plasma and manifestations in Birkeland currents, plasma discharges, etc. I think their understanding of craters being formed by electric or plasma discharges better fits the evidence as well. Such as at Meteor Crater in Arizona, etc.

    I think there can be a merging or combination of the two theories quite easily. Perhaps the authors of UM could look into the EU theory.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)